Registered reports: prospective peer review emphasizes science over spin
Scientific studies are typically considered for publication after they are completed and the results are available. Consequently, the decision to publish is based not only on the importance of the research question and the quality of the methods used, but also on the novelty and statistical significance of the authors’ findings. This in turn creates perverse incentives for researchers to seek surprising, positive results, and to prioritize creative interpretation of data over accurate discovery.
Source: fertstert.org
Registered reports: prospective peer review emphasizes science over spin
More from Embryology and Reproductive MedicineMore posts in Embryology and Reproductive Medicine »
- Life after Stillbirth
- The possible impact of COVID 19 on fertility and ART
- Human embryonic stem cell–derived blastocyst-like spheroids resemble human trophectoderm during early implantation process
- What support is available for you in hospital if you lose your baby
- Estrogen receptor-α immunoreactivity predicts symptom severity and pain recurrence in deep endometriosis
Be First to Comment